Short explainers that answer the question first. Each one says what it knows, where any figure came from, and where the honest limit is.
AIO ranking is how visible your pages are inside Google’s AI Overviews, the AI-written answer that appears above the search results. Ranking in an AI Overview means the answer cites your page as a source or names your brand in its text. It’s measured separately from your position in the list of links beneath it.
GEO ranking (as in generative engine optimisation) is how visible your brand and pages are in the answers AI assistants such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude and Perplexity give to your buyers’ questions. It’s measured question by question and assistant by assistant: does the answer cite you, name you, both, or run without you?
A good AIO or GEO ranking tool tracks your visibility in Google’s AI Overviews and in AI assistants question by question, keeps cited, named and both as separate verdicts, stores each engine’s exact answer, names who appears instead of you and, ideally, tells you whether a page is ready to be used before you spend on it, not only what happened afterwards.
Answer-engine optimisation (AEO) is the practice of measuring and shaping your content so that AI answer engines (Google’s AI Overviews, and assistants like ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude and Perplexity) use your pages as the source of their answer. Where SEO works on your position in the list of links, AEO works on appearing inside the answer itself.
Being cited means the AI answer links to your page as a source; being named means it writes your brand into the text with no link. A citation can send you a visitor; a mention builds awareness. So the two should be measured separately, along with answers that do both.
Less than it used to. When an AI summary answers the question on the results page, many people get what they need without clicking. Pew Research Center found click-through roughly halves when a summary is present, from about 15% to 8%. A first-place page can hold its position and still lose the visit.
Most search programmes measure one of four things and infer the rest. The order the questions are asked in is where the money leaks.
OpinionEvery serious search platform now reports on AI answers. Almost none tells you anything before the budget is committed.
OpinionAverage position is a specialist’s number. Leadership already has its own language for demand. Use that.
OpinionMarketing analytics fills its gaps with confident estimates. A measurement product earns trust by refusing to.
OpinionEvery rate a marketing team reports has a denominator. On one enterprise site, a third of it was never a person.
Nobody can be in two countries during one visit. That single fact removes a surprising share of traffic, and none of the sales.
FeatureThe most common campaign failure is a promise the landing page never makes. It’s also the cheapest to catch.
FeatureA site seen for thousands of searches needs a few dozen decisions, not thousands. Five buckets make the difference.
FeatureMost search programmes stall between the recommendation and the release. The AI Command Center counts that gap.
FeatureEvery team has a list of competitors. The answer engines keep their own, and it’s often a different list.
FeaturePublished studies tell you what AI answers do to clicks on average. Your own searches tell you what they do to you.
The words the product uses, in one place, so a number in a meeting means the same thing to everyone in the room.
Add AI Marketing Radar as a connector in the AI assistant your team already uses, sign in with your AI Marketing Radar account, and ask questions about your own data in plain English. Access is read-only and limited to the workspaces you already belong to.
The questions that come up before a walkthrough, answered in a sentence or two.
207 SEO checks and 88 accessibility rules. What they cover, and what they don’t promise.